Unser Artikel
Walach, H., & Loef, M. (2015). Using a matrix-analytical approach tosynthesizing evidence solved incompatibility problem in the hierarchy ofevidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 1251-1260.
hat eine rege Diskussion ausgelöst.
Hier ist meine Antwort auf den ersten Kommentar von Adam La Caze im Journal of Clinical Epidemiology:
Walach, H. (2016). Old habits die hard – a reply to Adam La Caze.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 72, 7-9.
Er kann unter dem Link
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435616000627
bis 22.4.2015 kostenfrei heruntergeladen werden.
WEITERE LESENSWERTE BEITRÄGE
- (18) Why the Hierarchical Model of the “Evidence… Some Introductory Thoughts on Understanding Our New Publication Walach, H., & Loef, M. (2015). Using a matrix-analytical approach to synthesizing evidence solved incompatibility problem in the hierarchy of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 1251-1260. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.027 Before I make a few critical remarks about "Evidence Based Medicine (EBM)", I feel…
- The majority of treatment successes can be traced… Our meta-analysis on the placebo effect has been published [1] For quite some time now, I have been investigating a phenomenon that I find very curious: the improvement rates of patients in clinical trials who are in the treatment groups and those who are in the placebo groups are highly…
- (21) Circle Instead of Hierarchy in a Bayesian Analysis How the Circular Model Works in Concrete Terms and Why It Is Superior to the Hierarchical One – The Example of the Ketogenic Diet Just now a new publication of ours appeared in an online journal, in which we demonstrated how to implement the circular model of cognition in concrete…
